Skip to main content

Animals and Society Class - Discussion 4, Zoos

Q: How are zoos an example of classifying and categorizing of animals today? What role might culture have in their approach to education and entertainment of their videos? Or in the kinds of animals they have? How might zoos reinforce ideas of charismatic megafauna? Provide examples to support your answers.

A: Zoos classify and categorize animals in the literal sense of often having like animals grouped together in close proximity; e.g. a reptile house, an aviary, a section for insects, etc. However, they also categorize them by popularity to some extent. The factor of “charismatic megafauna” comes into play in choosing which animals to keep, and where to house them. But it isn’t fair to say that zoos only house those animals we love to see. Zoos do work to be educational about the intrinsic value of every animal they display – plaques and videos will try to convert you to the merits of scorpions – but most of the visitors probably didn’t come for the scorpions. And zoos know this.

In pursuit of their goal to educate and excite future generations of scientists, while contributing to science today by learning more about animal behavior; preserving endangered species; and preserving genetic material that would otherwise be lost forever - they have to straddle the divide between education and entertainment. While Keith Lovett is right in his TED talk, where he mentioned his colleague taking earthworms to a demonstration – that even worms can be made interesting when talked about by someone who knows them well, to an audience unfamiliar with them, zoos know people are not paying admission for earthworms.

So, zoos stock the impressive, cute, exotic, animals we expect to see in a zoo. They offer the lions and tigers and bears we can’t find by digging a hole in the backyard. And they try to get us emotionally invested in things like the birth of baby animals. Zoos need us to care. About a decade ago now, I guess, a cobra escaped from a zoo in New York. The Bronx Zoo Cobra still has an active twitter account of almost 150,000 followers, including me. And all because a genius at the zoo decided to engage the public in an entertaining way about an otherwise possibly disturbing situation, by anthropomorphizing the snake through tweets. If zoos have to lure in an audience with a majestic lion, a newborn giraffe, a seemingly cuddly koala, or a tweeting snake, in order to preserve endangered species and add to scientific knowledge - that’s just putting our cultural biases about charismatic megafauna to good use. I don’t think it would be fair to say they reinforce these biases, so much as they exploit them for the greater good.

I grew up in Orange County California, and when I was a child my two favorite places to go were the San Diego Zoo and the LA County Museum of Natural History, and for the same reason, the animals. Obviously, the live animals at the zoo were more fun to watch, but the museum offered animals the zoo couldn’t. When I was very young, I loved any and all zoos I could get my parents to visit, including little ones (at the time anyway) like the one in Santa Ana, and the postage stamp sized one in Big Bear that had a badger that had been in a Disney movie. Another favorite when I was young was Marineland Aquarium in LA (long closed now).

But as I got older, I started to feel bad for the animals. I felt they had been imprisoned and were leading pitiful lives I couldn’t stand to look at. With the exception of the zoo in Big Bear, where all the animals had some rehabbed malady that prevented them from returning to the wild, I stopped enjoying zoos altogether by the time I was about 10. It is only as an adult that I have begun to appreciate the role zoos play in species preservation, and that good ones care for the animals in the healthiest and most natural ways possible. And that if not for zoos, museums would be the only places left to see certain animals. Though I admit, I still can’t stand to see performing dolphins or orcas. Performing animals all fall more in the category of circuses than zoos as far as I’m concerned, and I can’t watch.




Popular Previous Posts

The Ethics of Eating Meat - Animals and Society Class Discussion

Q: After reviewing the course materials for Weeks 6 and 7, discuss the concepts of moral equality and moral recognition. How do they impact the treatment of animals and people? What are the ethics of keeping animals in captivity and killing animals? How do animals become meat? How does the consumption of meat establish borders between classes, races and genders? What are some of the ethical questions surrounding the consumption of animals?  Photo by Christopher Carson on Unsplash A: Moral equality is the principle that all people have equal human rights – or that at least is the way it should be; the ideal. Moral recognition is the acknowledgement that there are differences between various groups of people (different genders, races, beliefs, behaviors, levels of intelligence, etc.), but the ideal of equality should still be applied; the differences should not merit different treatment.  However, this idealized equality – which we still struggle to apply to all people – is most defin

I'm Posting on YouTube Now

I have been thinking about getting back on YouTube for a while now (a friend and I used to have a fledgling lifestyle channel together), but with a more writing/reading-related focus.  Since I am still between homes (sold old place and new one is still not fixed up en ough to move into) I haven't felt able to start back up on YouTube. I figured no one wants to see me and five small noisy dogs cramped into a tiny bedroom (with all but current schoolbooks still in boxes). Not quite the background I would like to present. But then I thought, I could always try recording and posting my real time random word poem writing sessions. They're short, and hopefully/possibly interesting. Now I admit this first video needs to be improved upon greatly when it comes to camerawork. But it's a first attempt, so cut me some slack. I'll work out the kinks as I go.  

Animals and Society Class - Discussion 4

Q: How has the question of humanness/what it means to be human changed over time in human thought? What roles do animals play in human thought? Why is it important to look at animals according to Berger? Why is important that animals cannot “look” back at us in the same way? How do you see Banksy’s installation The Village Pet Shop and Charcoal Grill and/or Sirens of the Lambs challenging the way we use and socially construct animals? How does the installations question the way we may look at animals in our daily lives? A: The concept of humanness is nothing more than a social construct. And where a living being falls on the scale of perceived humanness has always been determined by those with the power to do so (mostly white European men, historically). While the definition has broadened over time it has not necessarily deepened. True, it now includes women and non-white ethnicities most of the time , though obviously animal terms are hurled towards these groups as slurs even to this