Skip to main content

Animals and Society Class - Discussion 4

Q: How has the question of humanness/what it means to be human changed over time in human thought? What roles do animals play in human thought? Why is it important to look at animals according to Berger? Why is important that animals cannot “look” back at us in the same way? How do you see Banksy’s installation The Village Pet Shop and Charcoal Grill and/or Sirens of the Lambs challenging the way we use and socially construct animals? How does the installations question the way we may look at animals in our daily lives?

A: The concept of humanness is nothing more than a social construct. And where a living being falls on the scale of perceived humanness has always been determined by those with the power to do so (mostly white European men, historically). While the definition has broadened over time it has not necessarily deepened. True, it now includes women and non-white ethnicities most of the time, though obviously animal terms are hurled towards these groups as slurs even to this day – and to very detrimental effect, including genocide (people were rats in Nazi Germany and cockroaches in Rwanda). And sometimes, now, it stretches to include our anthropomorphized companion animals. However, it is still arbitrary and created and regulated by a handful of the living beings on the planet. And the disturbing quality at the core of this construct, is the fact that a creature’s perceived humanness is directly related to what rights will be assigned by the powerful, and how that being will be treated in both life and death. There used to be little difference, legally, between a white man’s wife, his slave, and his horse. An eyebrow might be raised if he killed his wife or raped his horse but not the other way around, and a slave didn’t even get an eyebrow for either.

 

Animals originally occupied a place of fascination bordering on wonder in human thought. They were active parts of our imaginary worlds, in which we assigned them symbolic characteristics and sometimes ever magical powers. Via a combination of familiarity and otherness, we mentally fixated on creatures with whom we had much closer contact than we do now, and yet ones which could not in fact speak to us in a language we understood.

 

Looking at animals is important because we have largely lost our previous connection to them. Aside from our companion animals, most people are rarely, if ever, exposed to animals anymore. Looking at them, is literally all that a lot of us can do in the modern era, and Berger suggests looking at them is a kind of memorial to that lost past. The fact that animals don’t look back at us the same way, or at least we perceive them to not be returning our gaze similarly, contributes to our sense of distance from them. We go to a zoo to ogle them, and the fact that they largely ignore us while we do so, emboldens us to think they don’t know or care if we spy and eavesdrop. So, we settle into our arms-length distance from them and avoid imagining ourselves in their places.

 

The videos about Banksy’s art challenge the way we use and see animals in that it reminds us to consider the animal behind the thing. Moving chicken nuggets, swimming fish sticks, cute fluffy bleating stuffed animals poking their heads out of a truck on their way to “slaughter” are all designed to make us stop and realize the sources of the commodities we buy. We are fundamentally removed now, from the truth of where things come from and how they get to us. By and large, there is no more horse or cow out in the barn, usually no chickens scratching in the dirt outside the kitchen door, no more hog wallowing in the mud waiting for kitchen and garden scraps to convert into ham or bacon (and countless other items) that I will participate in converting. Now, we know pictures of chickens, videos maybe, and sleek little bits of boneless skinless-ness that come tightly packed in earth-destroying plastic and Styrofoam, at prices per pound that we grumble about. I wonder how many people eating a BLT could actually point to where on a pig’s body the bacon they’re eating originated.



 


Comments

Popular Previous Posts

Book Review - Three Tides - Part 4

Pineda’s ‘gathering’ chapters are all about the epic destruction of Katrina. I come away from this reading feeling some sense of relief that many people are decent human beings who will help others in times of need, including Pineda herself. Pineda talks a lot about the strong sense of community in New Orleans before the hurricane and that during the hurricane the effected people were repeatedly “helping one another, sharing what they had.” 
But the sense of relief at the humanity between individual people, gave way very quickly to disgust at the negligence of the organizations meant to help. Starting with the callous government officials who actually seem to have viewed Katrina as an opportunity to ‘clean up’ the “public housing” of New Orleans in favor of “urban renewal.” Rep. Richard Baker actually said as much, adding, “We couldn’t do it, but God did.” Apparently, they blew up the levees intentionally to sacrifice the poorer parts of town, in order to save the richer areas and tour…

Consolidation

I'm something of a compartmentalizer.

I had a personal blog and a writing blog. I had a website to advertise my freelance writing and other marketable skills, and a separate site to talk about my fiction writing saga. I have a personal twitter and a writing twitter. I didn't want to "bother" people from one area of my life with stuff from another. Didn't want to bore personal friends with talk of writing, or posted poetry. Didn't want to offend fellow word-lovers with my politics, or bore them with monotonous check-ins to the same handful of places (I'd be depressingly easy to stalk if anyone were so inclined, lol).

But I'm done with that.

Maybe it's the New Year, or my new word. Maybe it's just my age showing - I am in my fuck-it-forties, after all. Maybe it was an article I read which said that having a website under a cutesy online pseudonym (like my qwertyKayt) is best if your 'brand' is talking about writing, while having a site …

New blog content coming ... really ;-)

Ok, since I've been kind of neglecting my blog lately (Bad blogger!), I've decided to try something new here. Last semester I included book reviews and commentary for what I was reading in some of my classes. Since I'm taking a film class this semester, I've decided to share the commentary I'm writing for that class on here as well. Why not? They're all stories I'm experiencing in some fashion. They're all reactions and thoughts I'm having as a result. Who says I can review or comment on a book, but not a film? Not me ;-)