Skip to main content

Historical Jesus Class - Discussion 1

Discussion Questions:

  • Based on the reading and film, discuss examples of the layers of experience and interpretation that stand between the historical Jesus and the written sources on his life that we have access to. 
  • None of canonical Gospels claims to be a diary written as events happened, and none even claims to have been written down by direct eyewitnesses.  They and the other sources we have appear to be at the receiving end of orally transmitted reports passed down over time. 
  • What do you think were the major influences that may have shaped reports about Jesus as they were passed from person to person orally?  What expectations and experiences did the people have that might have shaped how stories about Jesus were told, or how certain things he taught were emphasized
    over others? 
  • How serious do you think the challenge is to recover historical facts about Jesus through these layers of interpretation?

  • Answer:

    Upon reading the question, “What do you think were the major influences that may have shaped reports about Jesus as they were passed from person to person orally?” my immediate thought was the religious/political context of the time. By that I mean the Jewish-Roman War of 66-74 CE and the destruction of the temple in 70CE, and the almost certain sense of chaos that caused. According to the book, the Q source was probably not much more than the collected sayings of Jesus, and Mark (which is considered to be roughly as original a source as Q) is described in the book as “historically worthless” due to it being so heavily influenced by “the author’s theological premises” (pg 27). With Matthew and Luke both being largely based off of Mark it seems notable that the further one gets from Q in time, the more the focus increases on the application of the old prophesies to Jesus’ life (Matthew paints Jesus “as a fulfillment of prophetic promises” and that via his conduct “Jesus fulfills the Torah” (pg 31)) and Jesus’s anointed status (Luke “designates Jesus the savior anointed with the Spirit of God” saying that he “proclaims salvation” to the outcasts (pg 32).

    The progression from ‘here are the things the wise man said’ to ‘he was clearly a fulfillment of prophesy sent to save us all’ which seems to be hinted at by the written version of the game of telephone that the synoptic Gospels display, just makes it seem more likely that the religious and political environment of the time had a part to play. The fact that Q is written down before the war and the destruction of the temple, possibly as early as the 40s or 50s (pg 29), but the earliest known version of Mark wasn’t written down until around the time the temple was destroyed, in the middle of the war (pg 26) seems very illustrative to me.

    And if this is the journey taken in writing, I can only assume it was first reflected in the oral versions between Q in the 40/50s and Mark in 70CE. I think it reflects, clearly, a circumstantial social/cultural need for a Messiah to appear so that one cannot trust the narrative at all. It could be completely accurate, it could be completely contrived to fit the expectations of the people in relation to a contemporary need for a savior, or it could be somewhere in the middle of the two.

    I think this possible shaping of the written narrative into what was expected and desired is a very complicating factor in trying to determine anything about the historical Jesus from the Gospels. Obviously, the basics of his existence, teaching, and execution, which even the non-Christian sources agree happened, can be assumed to be accurate. But not only can one not be certain of the veracity of his purported actions (particularly the miraculous or prophesy-fulfilling ones), but even of his sayings, since they are all, at least possibly, run through the same filter of a psychological need for him to be the prophesied Messiah. I think the film, with its focus on history and archaeology was a far more instructive source on an honest version of Jesus than anything to be found in the Synoptic Gospels.


    Book and Film Referenced


    Popular Previous Posts

    The Ethics of Eating Meat - Animals and Society Class Discussion

    Q: After reviewing the course materials for Weeks 6 and 7, discuss the concepts of moral equality and moral recognition. How do they impact the treatment of animals and people? What are the ethics of keeping animals in captivity and killing animals? How do animals become meat? How does the consumption of meat establish borders between classes, races and genders? What are some of the ethical questions surrounding the consumption of animals?  Photo by Christopher Carson on Unsplash A: Moral equality is the principle that all people have equal human rights – or that at least is the way it should be; the ideal. Moral recognition is the acknowledgement that there are differences between various groups of people (different genders, races, beliefs, behaviors, levels of intelligence, etc.), but the ideal of equality should still be applied; the differences should not merit different treatment.  However, this idealized equality – which we still struggle to apply to all people – is most defin

    I'm Posting on YouTube Now

    I have been thinking about getting back on YouTube for a while now (a friend and I used to have a fledgling lifestyle channel together), but with a more writing/reading-related focus.  Since I am still between homes (sold old place and new one is still not fixed up en ough to move into) I haven't felt able to start back up on YouTube. I figured no one wants to see me and five small noisy dogs cramped into a tiny bedroom (with all but current schoolbooks still in boxes). Not quite the background I would like to present. But then I thought, I could always try recording and posting my real time random word poem writing sessions. They're short, and hopefully/possibly interesting. Now I admit this first video needs to be improved upon greatly when it comes to camerawork. But it's a first attempt, so cut me some slack. I'll work out the kinks as I go.  

    Book Review - Three Tides - Part 4

    Pineda’s ‘gathering’ chapters are all about the epic destruction of Katrina. I come away from this reading feeling some sense of relief that many people are decent human beings who will help others in times of need, including Pineda herself. Pineda talks a lot about the strong sense of community in New Orleans before the hurricane and that during the hurricane the effected people were repeatedly “helping one another, sharing what they had.”  But the sense of relief at the humanity between individual people, gave way very quickly to disgust at the negligence of the organizations meant to help. Starting with the callous government officials who actually seem to have viewed Katrina as an opportunity to ‘clean up’ the “public housing” of New Orleans in favor of “urban renewal.” Rep. Richard Baker actually said as much, adding, “We couldn’t do it, but God did.” Apparently, they blew up the levees intentionally to sacrifice the poorer parts of town, in order to save the richer areas and tour