Skip to main content

Places in Motion - Reading Response 2

Places in Motion: The Fluid Identities of Temples, Images, and Pilgrims by Jacob N. Kinnard.
Thoughts on Chapters 4 & 5

I was most struck this week by what Kinnard refers to as “the “museumizing” of the temple complex” (pg 119), especially via the UNESCO World Heritage Site determination process. The mentality of imaging there is an “original” state to which the otherwise “active and fluid place” of the “living temple” (pg 118) should be returned, and then subsequently frozen in time to be “preserved” like an insect in amber, is mind-boggling to me in relation to an active religious site. Even if it were a genuinely disused archaeological ruin, the idea of ‘returning’ it to some imagined original form could be problematic – but in light of the current usage of this site I cannot comprehend how altering what is there currently could be anything other than destructive to how it is being used.

I was particularly provoked by what Kinnard called “the ambiguities of preservation” (pg 142) since I can absolutely understand the impulse to not let culturally important places rot or disappear. However, he is right when he says that “[c]onservation and preservation … are not value-neutral activities” (pg 124). However well intended, it is a very ethically challenging concept for me to see a Western body like UNESCO waltz into a different culture (one which 100-200 years ago UN member nations would have had a colonial interest in) and declare anything “the property of the whole world” (pg 120). It smacks of a modern-day colonial ethos which should be more fully explored and questioned, especially in regard to execution. While the guiding principle of preservation might be helpful – ignorant implementation can do more harm than good.

And to attempt to ‘preserve’ an actively evolving religious site, without any intercultural understanding of the fact that without transformations like religious images being painted, clothed, or bejeweled “these gods “die” in so far as their devotees are concerned” seems doomed from the start. Since the various layers of the temple and the iconography are “both a record of prior use and part of current practice” for an entity like UNESCO to even suggest that non-original elements should be removed is, indeed, to “do violence to the character of the temple” (pg 135). To envision and define such a living place as a static archaeological site not only denies it’s “larger complex, messy history” (pg 136), but creates a fundamentally inaccurate view of it as a place ready for a museum display, “devoid of people” (pg 141), and kills the  place in order to preserve it (pg 142).


Popular Previous Posts

The Ethics of Eating Meat - Animals and Society Class Discussion

Q: After reviewing the course materials for Weeks 6 and 7, discuss the concepts of moral equality and moral recognition. How do they impact the treatment of animals and people? What are the ethics of keeping animals in captivity and killing animals? How do animals become meat? How does the consumption of meat establish borders between classes, races and genders? What are some of the ethical questions surrounding the consumption of animals?  Photo by Christopher Carson on Unsplash A: Moral equality is the principle that all people have equal human rights – or that at least is the way it should be; the ideal. Moral recognition is the acknowledgement that there are differences between various groups of people (different genders, races, beliefs, behaviors, levels of intelligence, etc.), but the ideal of equality should still be applied; the differences should not merit different treatment.  However, this idealized equality – which we still struggle to apply to all people – is most defin

I'm Posting on YouTube Now

I have been thinking about getting back on YouTube for a while now (a friend and I used to have a fledgling lifestyle channel together), but with a more writing/reading-related focus.  Since I am still between homes (sold old place and new one is still not fixed up en ough to move into) I haven't felt able to start back up on YouTube. I figured no one wants to see me and five small noisy dogs cramped into a tiny bedroom (with all but current schoolbooks still in boxes). Not quite the background I would like to present. But then I thought, I could always try recording and posting my real time random word poem writing sessions. They're short, and hopefully/possibly interesting. Now I admit this first video needs to be improved upon greatly when it comes to camerawork. But it's a first attempt, so cut me some slack. I'll work out the kinks as I go.  

Animals and Society Class - Discussion 4

Q: How has the question of humanness/what it means to be human changed over time in human thought? What roles do animals play in human thought? Why is it important to look at animals according to Berger? Why is important that animals cannot “look” back at us in the same way? How do you see Banksy’s installation The Village Pet Shop and Charcoal Grill and/or Sirens of the Lambs challenging the way we use and socially construct animals? How does the installations question the way we may look at animals in our daily lives? A: The concept of humanness is nothing more than a social construct. And where a living being falls on the scale of perceived humanness has always been determined by those with the power to do so (mostly white European men, historically). While the definition has broadened over time it has not necessarily deepened. True, it now includes women and non-white ethnicities most of the time , though obviously animal terms are hurled towards these groups as slurs even to this